The Apollo 11 moon landing of 1969 is still perhaps the greatest human achievement in history. Yet, notwithstanding all of this overwhelming evidence, conspiracy theories have continued to bubble up, most recently with some skeptics suggesting that the landing was faked. Among the most infamous confrontations regarding this theory involved Neil Armstrong, the first man to walk on the Moon.
The Controversial Demand: Swearing on the Bible
One of the most vocal moon-deniers, Bart Sibrel, filmmaker and conspiracy theorist, made it his mission to prove that the Apollo missions were staged. As of the above, he managed to approach several astronauts, such as Buzz Aldrin, Alan Bean, Ed Mitchell, and many others questioning them to swear before God in person over the Bible that they had walked on the Moon. However, this did not deter Neil Armstrong, popularly known to be imbued with a reserved and dignified nature from being lured into the deceit.
Here is the Video Link: Instagram
Why Did Neil Armstrong Refuse?
Many skeptics have interpreted this refusal as an indication that he had something to hide. But the actual answer is much more obvious and less complicated than that:
1. There was Nothing He Needed to Prove
Armstrong was both an incredibly well-known astronaut and a man of science and had, before this, shared thousands of hours of interviews, declassified mission footage, and evidence that corroborated his “moon” narrative. He felt there was no need to entertain conspiracy theorists or dignify their baseless accusations with responses.
2. The Demand Was Rude
For Armstrong, swearing on the Bible for an unknown person was an insult to his character as well as to his faith. He had risked his life walking on the Moon’s surface; the very idea that a conspiracy theorist would demand a religious oath as some kind of ‘proof’ was irreverent.
3. Armstrong’s Private Nature
Unlike other astronauts, Neil Armstrong was hyper-shy. After Apollo 11, he seldom gave interviews and purposefully avoided providing public commentary on conspiracy theories. He would say that his acts and references from NASA should speak for themselves.
A Different Approach by Buzz Aldrin
While Armstrong managed to maintain his cool, fellow Apollo 11 astronaut Buzz Aldrin had a far more dramatic run-in with Bart Sibrel. When Sibrel 2002 raged up to Aldrin, brandishing a Bible accusing him of being a liar and a coward, Aldrin punched him with his fist. The altercation was filmed and, later, found to be self-defense.
Evidence of the Moon Landing
Evidence strongly favors the moon landing for anybody who doubts it:
- Moon rocks were brought back from the Apollo missions, and these are independently verified by scientists worldwide.
- Tracking from the outside: Apollo missions were tracked by the Soviets and by independent radio operators.
- Retroreflectors were installed by Apollo astronauts on the moon, and they can still be used today for measuring the distance from Earth.
- Modern lunar orbiters took extensive high-resolution images of the Apollo landing sites, where footmarks and equipment were left behind.
Conclusion
Neil Armstrong, when came to swearing on the Bible about the moon landing, was not because he was guilty; it was a refusal to engage with nonsensical conspiracy theories. Any evidence, but especially, hard evidence, should have been enough to uphold his terms as an astronaut and pioneer-things just sensationalist wouldn’t wash away: that he made humanity’s very first footprints on the Moon.
